Overview

DIVISION OF PROCESS TECHNOLOGY

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

10.9

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

82.8 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

92.3 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 82.8%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

DIVISION OF PROCESS TECHNOLOGY

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 3.4 3.0 3.3 3.0 4.6 2.2 8.1 27.6 93.8% 0.9
Article, other NA 0.6 0.3 NA 1.0 0.1 NA 2.1 94.6% 0.5
Conference paper, peer review 0.2 NA 0.3 1.2 0.5 1.3 1.8 5.3 25.2% 0.9
Conference paper, other 0.6 NA NA NA 0.2 1.0 NA 1.8 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book NA 0.3 NA NA NA 0.5 NA 0.8 0.0% 1.0
Report NA NA NA 0.3 NA NA NA 0.3 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis 1.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 1.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 11 12 10 10 15 12 24 94 95.7% 1
Article, other NA 2 1 NA 2 1 NA 6 83.3% 0
Conference paper, peer review 1 NA 1 4 1 2 4 13 30.8% 1
Conference paper, other 2 NA NA NA 1 1 NA 4 0.0% 0
Chapter in book NA 1 NA NA NA 1 NA 2 0.0% 1
Report NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 1 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

DIVISION OF PROCESS TECHNOLOGY

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 3.4 18.2 5.4 0.0 0.0%
2015 3.2 18.0 5.7 0.5 16.9%
2016 3.3 18.3 5.5 0.7 19.9%
2017 4.0 17.0 4.3 0.7 16.7%
2018 5.6 44.2 7.9 0.0 0.0%
Total 19.4 115.7 6.0 1.9 9.6%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 9.5 0.97 1.5 15.3%
2015-2017 9.2 0.91 0.8 8.3%
2016-2018 11.6 0.79 0.7 5.8%
2017-2019 10.8 0.83 0.6 5.7%
Total 20.3 0.90 2.1 10.2%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 10 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 90.1%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 30 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 94.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

DIVISION OF PROCESS TECHNOLOGY

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 9.5 1.30 3.3 34.2%
2015-2017 9.2 1.33 3.6 38.9%
2016-2018 11.6 1.25 4.0 34.7%
2017-2019 10.8 1.20 3.5 32.9%
2018-2020 14.7 1.06 4.0 27.0%
Total 27.2 1.18 8.5 31.2%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 30 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 92.2%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

DIVISION OF PROCESS TECHNOLOGY

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 32 5 15.6% 16 50.0%
2015-2017 31 7 22.6% 16 51.6%
2016-2018 36 9 25.0% 16 44.4%
2017-2019 39 10 25.6% 16 41.0%
2018-2020 51 11 21.6% 26 51.0%
Total 93 19 20.4% 45 48.4%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 31 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Germany 12 9 3 0 0 2.0
Denmark 6 6 0 0 0 1.8
Poland 8 7 1 0 0 1.8
South Africa 5 5 0 0 0 1.0
Uganda 5 5 0 0 0 0.9
United States 5 4 1 0 0 0.8
United Kingdom 4 4 0 0 0 0.7
Greece 4 3 1 0 0 0.6
Italy 3 2 1 0 0 0.6
Egypt 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Norway 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Hungary 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Mozambique 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Singapore 3 3 0 0 0 0.3
Bolivia 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Finland 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Estonia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
France 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Pakistan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Korea, Republic of 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Haldor Topsøe Company Denmark 6 6 0 0 0 1.8
Jagiellonian University in Krakow University Poland 7 6 1 0 0 1.3
Scania AB Company Sweden 7 7 0 0 0 1.3
Gulu University (GU) University Uganda 5 5 0 0 0 0.9
Makerere University University Uganda 5 5 0 0 0 0.9
Thunen Institute Institute Germany 5 5 0 0 0 0.9
Volvo AB Company Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 0.9
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 7 6 1 0 0 0.8
ReformTech Heating Technologies AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.8
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden Institute Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Luleå University of Technology University Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 0.7
Stellenbosch University University South Africa 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
Stockholm University University Sweden 4 3 1 0 0 0.6
City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City) Institute Egypt 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Pharos University in Alexandria (PUA) University Egypt 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Kielce Univ Technol NA Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Uppsala University University Sweden 3 2 1 0 0 0.5
Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Norway 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of Cincinnati University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
University of Duisburg-Essen University Germany 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology University Germany 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Cortus Energy AB Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Princeton University University United States 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG) Institute Germany 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Other South Africa 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Eduardo Mondlane University (UEM) University Mozambique 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Hull University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Miskolc University Hungary 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
National University of Singapore University Singapore 3 3 0 0 0 0.3
Yale-NUS College University College Singapore 3 3 0 0 0 0.3
Aalto University University Finland 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
E.ON Kernkraft GmbH Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Höganäs AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Sapienza University of Rome University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
SINTEF Institute Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Verdant Chemical Technologies AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas (FORTH) Other Public Greece 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
University of Crete University Greece 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
University of Göttingen University Germany 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) Other Public Singapore 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
University of Kansas University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Alexandria University University Egypt 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Käppala Association Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
National Technical University of Athens University Greece 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Scandinavian Centriair AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Swedish Environmental Research Institute Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Tallinn University of Technology University Estonia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Perugia University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Lund University University Sweden 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Aston University University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Centre for Research & Technology - Hellas (CERTH) Institute Greece 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Higher University of San Andrés (UMSA) University Bolivia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Institute Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Cordoba University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Wah (UOW) University Pakistan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
FCyT Univ Mayor San Simon University Bolivia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Knightec AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
UMSS Univ Mayor San Simon University Bolivia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Lycee Pierre Gilles de Gennes NA France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Queen’s University Belfast University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Birmingham University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Polish Academy of Science Other Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Queen Mary University of London University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Research Council (CNR) Other Public Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Paul Scherrer Institute Institute Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Washington University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
CentraleSupélec Institute France 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences University College Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Darmstadt University of Technology University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
RWTH Aachen University University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Sogang University University Korea, Republic of 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

DIVISION OF PROCESS TECHNOLOGY

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.0%
2015 12 3 2 0 1 0 9 25.0%
2016 9 1 0 0 0 1 8 11.1%
2017 13 4 2 0 1 1 9 30.8%
2018 16 4 3 1 0 0 12 25.0%
2019 14 4 1 1 2 0 10 28.6%
2020 25 11 3 8 0 0 14 44.0%
Total 99 27 11 10 4 2 72 27.3%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

DIVISION OF PROCESS TECHNOLOGY

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 3.1 78.5 24.9 0.5 15.9%
2015 3.0 71.3 23.6 0.0 0.0%
2016 3.7 55.0 14.9 0.3 9.1%
2017 4.1 41.1 9.9 0.7 16.1%
2018 5.6 67.9 12.2 0.0 0.0%
2019 2.7 23.1 8.7 0.4 16.3%
2020 6.9 21.2 3.1 1.8 26.3%
Total 29.1 358.0 12.3 3.8 12.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 10 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 83.2%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 9.0 1.55 3.0 33.6%
2015-2017 10.5 1.25 1.8 17.0%
2016-2018 13.1 1.07 1.4 10.3%
2017-2019 12.4 1.08 1.0 8.0%
Total 21.4 1.28 4.0 18.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 33 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 96.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 9.5 1.72 7.5 78.9%
2015-2017 9.9 1.62 6.9 70.3%
2016-2018 12.4 1.61 7.8 62.7%
2017-2019 11.4 1.60 7.5 65.9%
2018-2020 14.3 1.56 9.0 62.7%
Total 27.4 1.62 18.9 69.0%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 33 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 33 6 18.2% 16 48.5%
2015-2017 37 6 16.2% 18 48.6%
2016-2018 42 6 14.3% 19 45.2%
2017-2019 45 7 15.6% 19 42.2%
2018-2020 54 10 18.5% 29 53.7%
Total 101 17 16.8% 49 48.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 33 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 93.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row